Newsfeed

Breastfeeding · November 1, 2026

New mothers on thyroid pills often wonder if their first milk is 'weaker'. In 120 Polish mothers, it was not

Researchers at a Gdańsk hospital milk bank measured the fat, protein, sugar and calories in the first milk of 45 women whose underactive thyroid was treated in pregnancy and 75 women without thyroid disease. The two sets of samples were almost identical, and the size of the daily dose made no difference. What the study could not see matters too.

Two breast milk bottles side by side: thick yellow colostrum on the left, paler mature breast milk on the right
Photo by Tonicthebrown, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Resized. General illustration of colostrum and mature milk; it is not from the study.

An underactive thyroid is one of the most common hormone problems in pregnancy. The authors of a new study put it at 3 to 5.5% of pregnant women, and most are treated with levothyroxine, a daily tablet that replaces the missing hormone. Thyroid hormones help the breast prepare for milk, and earlier studies have hinted that untreated or poorly controlled hypothyroidism can change what is in the milk. That leaves treated mothers with an obvious question: is my first milk as good as everyone else's? A study published on 29 October in Frontiers in Nutrition looked at exactly that early milk, colostrum.

The team works at the neonatology department and human milk bank of the University Clinical Center in Gdańsk, Poland. Between March 2024 and April 2026 they recruited 120 women who had just given birth there: 45 whose hypothyroidism had been treated and kept within pregnancy target ranges, and 75 with normal thyroid function. Smokers, women with diabetes and women whose babies had recently had formula were left out. Each mother gave up to 15 mL of colostrum in the first five days after birth, mostly on day four or five, collected between 8 a.m. and 2 p.m. The samples were coded so the people analysing them did not know which group they came from, then run through a mid-infrared milk analyser two or three times each.

The results were strikingly similar. Median fat was 2.5 g per 100 mL in the thyroid group and 2.6 g in the comparison group; crude protein was 2.0 and 2.1 g; carbohydrate 7.9 and 7.8 g; energy 64 and 63 kcal per 100 mL. None of the differences came close to statistical significance, and the effect sizes were described as negligible. Within the thyroid group, the levothyroxine dose before delivery averaged 89 micrograms a day (range 25 to 235), and a bigger or smaller dose was not linked to any of the milk measures. The babies were also similar in birth weight, length, head size and Apgar scores.

The authors are careful about what this does not show. To protect feeding, they only took samples from mothers who had milk to spare, so women whose milk came in late or in small amounts, a problem that has been linked to thyroid trouble, were not in the study. The analyser measures only fat, protein, sugar and calories, not fatty acid types, vitamins, hormones or immune factors, and only colostrum was tested, not mature milk. The study was large enough to spot a moderate difference between groups but not a small one. One exploratory finding, that milk sugar rose slightly with pregnancy length in the comparison group but not in the thyroid group, needs confirming. Within those limits, it is a reassuring result for mothers whose thyroid is well managed.

Analysis by NutroPractic from the sources listed. Written for general readers; it does not replace advice from your own doctor.

Newsfeed for your website

Want this feed on your website?

Add it to any site with one copy-and-paste snippet. No sign-up, and it updates itself every hour.

Get the code

Start with a virtual consultation

Tell Dr. Triveni what you want to change. You will leave with a clear next step, whether you are in Toronto, London, New York or Chennai.

Book an appointment