Newsfeed

Pregnancy nutrition · October 31, 2026

In a 351-person pregnancy trial, food tips plus a few practical kitchen tools held energy intake steady while usual care climbed by 263 calories a day

A Louisiana WIC programme sent 24 weeks of remote nutrition support, recipes and basic cooking equipment to pregnant participants. By late pregnancy, the intervention group was eating about 306 fewer calories a day than usual care, with less fat and carbohydrate and a slightly bigger share of protein. The study's own twist: those diet changes did not explain who gained less pregnancy weight.

Fresh vegetables displayed at an outdoor farmers market
Photo: Lance Cheung / USDA, 2012. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. Resized.

Pregnancy nutrition advice often arrives as a long list of things to eat less of and more of, with little help making that fit a busy household. A trial in Louisiana asked whether a more practical kind of support could change what people ate. The SmartMoms in WIC programme added remote health education, recipes and cooking equipment to the regular services of the United States Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. A new analysis, published on 5 October in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, looks at the food records behind the programme.

The study enrolled 351 pregnant people with low incomes through Louisiana WIC clinics, at an average of 15 weeks of pregnancy. Researchers randomly assigned 179 to the 24-week SmartMoms programme and 172 to usual WIC care. Both groups completed repeated 24-hour food recalls early in pregnancy and again at 35 to 37 weeks. The intervention was not a single app or a prescribed diet: it combined remote tips with food-focused resources intended to make everyday changes more doable.

The biggest contrast was total energy. From early to late pregnancy, estimated intake in the SmartMoms group changed by 44 calories a day downward, a result compatible with no real change. In usual care it rose by 263 calories a day. The adjusted difference between groups was 306 calories a day. The intervention group also ended with 12 grams less total fat and 48 grams less carbohydrate a day than usual care, while protein made up two percentage points more of its calories.

That does not mean the trial has found a calorie target for pregnancy. The researchers had previously found lower gestational weight gain with the programme, but in this analysis the changes in reported food intake did not predict gestational weight gain. That gap matters: food recalls are snapshots, people can under- or over-report, and activity, nausea, access to food, metabolism and many other factors can change weight during pregnancy. The programme was a package, so this study cannot separate the effect of a recipe, a kitchen tool or an individual message.

Still, the result is useful because it is about a real service rather than an idealised meal plan. The study suggests that adding sustained, practical support to an existing nutrition programme can shift the pattern of intake late in pregnancy. It does not show that pregnant people should restrict food on their own. Energy needs vary with the stage of pregnancy, starting weight, health, activity and whether someone is carrying more than one baby. Personal advice belongs with an obstetric or midwifery team and, when available, a registered dietitian.

Analysis by NutroPractic from the sources listed. Written for general readers; it does not replace advice from your own doctor.

Newsfeed for your website

Want this feed on your website?

Add it to any site with one copy-and-paste snippet. No sign-up, and it updates itself every hour.

Get the code

Start with a virtual consultation

Tell Dr. Triveni what you want to change. You will leave with a clear next step, whether you are in Toronto, London, New York or Chennai.

Book an appointment