Newsfeed

Hydration · October 29, 2026

Drink on schedule or when thirsty? 24 small trials of long rides and runs were pooled. In races against the clock, the water made no clear difference to finishing times

Every long race has its water stations, and every runner has a theory about them. A new review gathered the randomised trials that tested drinking during at least an hour of running or cycling. Bodies ran a little cooler and hearts a little slower with fluid. Whether anyone got to the finish sooner is a different story.

A Marine in camouflage hands a paper cup of water to a runner in a white shirt during a marathon on a leaf-strewn autumn road, with more runners behind
Photo: U.S. Navy, Photographer's Mate 1st Class Shane T. McCoy, Marine Corps Marathon, Washington, D.C., 31 October 2004. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons. Resized.

How much to drink during a long run or ride is one of the oldest arguments in endurance sport. One camp says plan it: weigh yourself, work out your sweat rate and drink to a target. The other says thirst is a good enough guide. Drinking too little lets the body's water run down, and drinking far too much can dilute the blood's sodium, which is its own danger. Researchers in Shijiazhuang and Jilin, China, set out to see what the randomised trials actually show, and published a systematic review with meta-analysis in Frontiers in Nutrition on 27 October.

They searched six databases up to 1 June 2026 for trials in healthy adults doing at least 60 minutes of continuous endurance exercise, in which the drinking strategy itself was assigned at random. Twenty-four studies made the cut, all crossover trials where the same people tried each approach, with 6 to 20 participants each and 225 in total. Most were cyclists or runners in a laboratory, often in heat of 30 °C or more. Of the 190 people whose sex was reported, only 20 were women.

Drinking against little or no fluid gave a split picture. In self-paced tests, where people rode or ran a set distance or time as hard as they could, performance was no different on average: minus 0.1%, with a range from 3.6% worse to 3.5% better (four studies, 30 people). In open-ended tests, where people kept going until they couldn't, they lasted about 34% longer with fluid, but that came from only three studies and 21 people, and the range of results a new study might expect still included no benefit at all.

The body's readings leaned towards drinking. Core temperature ended about 0.4 °C lower on average (nine studies) and heart rate about 7 beats a minute lower (12 studies). Both results varied a lot from trial to trial. Planned drinking against drinking to thirst made no clear difference to self-paced performance (0.7%, three studies, 27 people). It did mean people finished having lost about 1.5 percentage points less of their body weight, which the authors point out is simply what happens when you drink more, not a benefit in itself. There was too little evidence to say anything about how much sodium helps.

The authors rate every main result as very low certainty. The trials were small and mostly men, and the authors are open about how the analysis changed after it was registered and that parts of their search records weren't kept. What the review does show is narrower than either camp might like: drinking during long exercise eases some of the strain on the body, but these trials can't name an ideal amount, and they don't show that drinking to a plan beats drinking to thirst when the clock is running.

Analysis by NutroPractic from the sources listed. Written for general readers; it does not replace advice from your own doctor.

Newsfeed for your website

Want this feed on your website?

Add it to any site with one copy-and-paste snippet. No sign-up, and it updates itself every hour.

Get the code

Start with a virtual consultation

Tell Dr. Triveni what you want to change. You will leave with a clear next step, whether you are in Toronto, London, New York or Chennai.

Book an appointment