Pregnancy · October 8, 2026
Extra vitamin D in pregnancy gave children stronger-looking bones at age 6. By 13, the difference had gone
A Danish trial gave pregnant women 2,800 or 400 IU of vitamin D a day from week 24. Their children's bone scans looked better in the high-dose group at ages 3 and 6. Thirteen years on, the scans of 416 children showed no difference, and broken bones were about as common in both groups.

Vitamin D helps the body take up calcium and phosphate, the minerals bone is built from. That has led to a hopeful idea: if a mother has plenty of vitamin D in late pregnancy, her child might lay down more bone early on, reach a higher 'peak bone mass' in their twenties, and be less likely to get osteoporosis decades later. Two large trials seemed to support the first step. Both found that children of mothers given extra vitamin D had denser bones in early childhood. The question nobody could answer yet was whether that head start lasts. A Danish team has now followed one of those trials to age 13, and published the results in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe on 25 September 2026.
The trial is part of COPSAC2010, a group of 623 Copenhagen-area families who joined during pregnancy in 2009 and 2010. From week 24 of pregnancy until a week after birth, half of the mothers took 2,400 IU of vitamin D3 a day and half a look-alike placebo, on top of the 400 IU a day that Danish health advice already recommends. Neither the families nor the researchers knew who was taking what. In practice it compared 2,800 IU with 400 IU a day (70 versus 10 micrograms). When the children were 3 and 6, whole-body bone scans showed more bone mineral in the high-dose group, as the team reported in 2020.
At 13, 416 of the 584 children born into the trial had another scan, using DXA, the same low-dose X-ray method used to check adults for osteoporosis. Total bone mineral content averaged 1,869 g in the high-dose group and 1,891 g in the standard-dose group. Once age, sex, height, weight and scanner were taken into account, the difference was 6.7 g, well within chance. Bone density was the same, and so were the results for boys and girls separately, for children born in the darker months (when the earlier effect had been strongest) and for children whose mothers started the trial low in vitamin D. Putting the scans from ages 3, 6 and 13 together also showed no overall difference. By 13, 99 children had broken a bone at least once: 53 fractures in the high-dose group and 61 in the standard-dose group, a difference that could easily be chance.
The authors read this as a real but short-lived boost that does not carry into adolescence, which, they write, does not support the idea that vitamin D in pregnancy alone shapes peak bone mass and later osteoporosis risk. There are caveats. The trial was designed to test asthma and wheezing, not bones, so it may have been too small to pick up modest differences. Three in ten children had no scan at 13, the fracture analysis was decided after the fact, and bone density is hard to read around the growth spurt, when bones lengthen faster than they fill in. The other large trial, MAVIDOS in the UK, has reported results up to age 6 or 7 so far; its later follow-up will show whether the same fade happens there.
The trial at a glance
2,800 vs 400 IU
Daily vitamin D3 taken by mothers from pregnancy week 24 until a week after birth (high dose vs standard dose)
416 children
Had a whole-body bone scan at age 13 (71% of those born into the trial; 219 boys, 197 girls)
+6.7 g
Adjusted difference in total body bone mineral content, high vs standard dose (95% CI -28.3 to 41.6; p = 0.71)
53 vs 61
Fractures by age 13 in the high-dose vs standard-dose group, among 550 children followed fully
HR 0.85
Chance of a first fracture by age 13, high vs standard dose (95% CI 0.57 to 1.25; not significant)
Checked on the full open-access paper (The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, published 25 September 2026), a prespecified secondary analysis of the COPSAC2010 double-blind randomised trial (NCT00856947). Bone results are adjusted for age, sex, height, weight, scanner type and a parallel fish oil trial; the fracture analysis was post hoc. The trial's main outcome was persistent wheeze, not bone health. Funded by the Thrasher Research Fund and Kong Christian IX og Dronning Louises Jubilæumslegat; the authors declared no conflicts of interest.
- The same mothers were also part of a second trial at the same time, taking fish oil or olive oil capsules. Running two trials in one group of families is called a factorial design, and the bone analysis adjusted for it.
- Among children whose mothers took the high dose, those who still had good vitamin D levels at 6 months of age had more bone mineral at 13 than those who were low by then. It is an exploratory finding, but it hints that a baby's own vitamin D after birth may matter too.
- A modelling study from 2003 estimated that raising peak bone mass by 10% could put off osteoporosis by about 13 years, which is why researchers care so much about how much bone children and teenagers build.
- Prenatal high-dose vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone mineral content and density at age 13 years: a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trialThe Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 25 September 2026 · Open access; all study figures used here
- Full text on PubMed Central (PMC13633854)US National Library of Medicine · Tables, limitations and funding
- Effect of High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnancy on Bone Mineralization in Offspring Until Age 6 YearsJAMA Pediatrics, 2020 · The same trial's earlier result at ages 3 and 6
- Pregnancy vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone mineral density in childhood follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (MAVIDOS)The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2024 · The UK trial's childhood follow-up, as cited by the study
General information, not medical advice. If you are pregnant or planning a pregnancy, follow the vitamin D advice from your own doctor, midwife or national health service, and don't take high-dose supplements without asking them first. This study looked only at children's bones; vitamin D in pregnancy may matter for other reasons.
Analysis by NutroPractic from the sources listed. Written for general readers; it does not replace advice from your own doctor.
Newsfeed for your website
Want this feed on your website?
Add it to any site with one copy-and-paste snippet. No sign-up, and it updates itself every hour.
Start with a virtual consultation
Tell Dr. Triveni what you want to change. You will leave with a clear next step, whether you are in Toronto, London, New York or Chennai.