Probiotics · October 13, 2026
A probiotic made stools a little softer in a constipation trial. It did not get people to the toilet more often than a dummy powder did
For eight weeks, 87 adults with long-standing constipation in northwest China stirred a sachet into their day: half got 30 billion bacteria of one strain, half got the same powder with no bacteria in it. The probiotic group's stools moved up the hardness scale by most of a step, and the paper calls the strain effective. The rest of the results are quieter than that word suggests.

Constipation is one of the most common gut complaints there is. A review of studies using the standard Rome criteria put it at roughly one adult in ten worldwide, and it gets more common with age. Probiotics are an obvious thing to try: a sachet a day, sold over the counter, with the promise of nudging the gut's bacteria in a better direction. The trouble is that each strain of bacteria is its own product, and most have been tested in very few people.
A trial published in Food Science & Nutrition on 1 October 2026 tested one of them. The strain is called Pediococcus acidilactici PA53. Pediococcus is a lactic acid bacterium of the kind found in fermented foods, and it has been studied far more in mice and farm animals than in people.
The trial ran at the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University in Yinchuan, China, from August 2024 to May 2025. It took adults aged 18 to 70 with functional constipation, meaning no disease was found to explain it: fewer than three bowel movements a week, hard stools, or both. Anyone who had used laxatives, probiotics or antibiotics in the previous four weeks was left out. Eighty-seven people were randomly split into two groups. Each took one 3 gram sachet a day for eight weeks. In one group the sachet held 30 billion PA53 bacteria mixed into dextrin, a starch-based powder. In the other it held the dextrin alone. Neither the volunteers nor the researchers knew who had which until the end. Eighty-one people finished, and four in five of them were women.
The main measure was the Bristol Stool Form Scale, the seven-point chart doctors use to describe stools, from type 1 (separate hard lumps) to type 7 (entirely liquid). Types 1 and 2 count as hard. Both groups started at an average of about 2. After eight weeks the placebo group was still at 2.03. The probiotic group was at 2.76. That gap was statistically clear, and it is the result the paper leads with.
Put it in plain terms, though. A shift of about three quarters of a point means that, on average, stools went from lumpy towards the edge of the normal range, not into it. The authors call the change modest and argue that moving in the right direction matters to people with constipation. That is fair, but it is worth knowing how big the effect was before reading the word 'effective'.
Frequency is the other half of constipation, and here the picture is weaker. At the start, 7 of the 42 probiotic takers who finished had four to six bowel movements a week. By week eight, 16 did. That rise was significant within the group. But the placebo group also rose, from 5 of 39 to 9. Compared directly, the two groups were not clearly different. The trial also asked about quality of life with constipation and about mood, stress and anxiety. Neither changed in a meaningful way in either group, and the two groups ended up in much the same place.
The paper measured a lot more: gut hormones that speed up or slow down the bowel, three markers of inflammation in the blood, and the bacteria in stool samples. Several numbers moved within the probiotic group, and the abstract describes 'beneficial' changes in inflammatory markers. Read the results section and the authors say it plainly themselves: no between-group difference was significant for any of these blood markers. A within-group change only tells you that something shifted over eight weeks, and in this trial the placebo group's hormones drifted the same way. The stool tests did confirm that the bacterium turned up in the gut of people who took it. The variety of gut bacteria in that group actually fell a little over the eight weeks, which the paper reports without making much of it.
There are other limits the authors list. The trial was small, short and at one hospital. Diet was not controlled. The placebo was dextrin, which is a soluble fibre and may itself help the bowel slightly, so the true difference could be a bit larger than measured. Only those who finished were analysed. The probiotic and the placebo were supplied by the company that makes the strain, Wecare Probiotics; the authors report no other funding and no conflicts of interest.
What does this mean if you are constipated? One strain, at one dose, made stools somewhat softer than a dummy powder did over two months. It did not make people go more often or feel better than placebo. The usual first steps (more fibre from food, enough fluid, moving more) have far more evidence behind them. If constipation is new, getting worse, or comes with blood, weight loss or pain, see a doctor rather than a supplement shelf.
87 adults with functional constipation at one hospital in Yinchuan, China, given Pediococcus acidilactici PA53 (30 billion CFU a day) or a dextrin placebo for 8 weeks; 81 finished
2.76 vs 2.03
Average Bristol stool score after 8 weeks, probiotic vs placebo (both started at about 2; types 1 and 2 are hard)
+0.83
Rise in the probiotic group's stool score from baseline (1.93 to 2.76); the placebo group's rose by 0.03
7 → 16 of 42
Probiotic takers with 4 to 6 bowel movements a week, start vs week 8
5 → 9 of 39
Placebo takers with 4 to 6 bowel movements a week, start vs week 8; the difference between groups was not significant
0 of 6
Gut hormone and inflammation blood markers that differed significantly between the groups
None
Adverse events reported; routine blood safety tests stayed normal in both groups
Figures are from the open-access paper in Food Science & Nutrition (doi 10.1002/fsn3.72370, published 1 October 2026, CC BY), read in full on PubMed Central: methods, results, Tables 1 to 3 and the discussion. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled; registered as NCT06761443; single centre, 1 August 2024 to 30 May 2025. Randomised 87 (placebo 43, PA53 44); finished and analysed 81 (39 and 42); 2 lost and 2 withdrew on placebo, 2 withdrew on PA53. Mean age 45.3 (placebo) and 42.4 (PA53); 65 of the 81 were women. Daily sachet: 3 g dextrin with 3.0 x 10^10 CFU PA53, or 3 g dextrin alone. Bristol Stool Form Scale, mean (SD): placebo 2.00 (0.87) to 2.03 (0.85); PA53 1.93 (0.80) to 2.76 (0.93); within PA53 P = 0.001, between groups at week 8 P = 0.004. The +0.83 rise is our calculation from those means. Spontaneous bowel movements were recorded in bands (1-3, 4-6, 7 or more a week); the share at 4-6 went from 16.7% to 38.1% on PA53 (within-group P = 0.028) and 12.8% to 23.1% on placebo (P = 0.238); between groups at week 8 P = 0.144. Constipation quality of life (PAC-QOL) PA53 40.2 to 32.7, placebo 39.1 to 36.3, between groups P = 0.780; DASS-21 between groups P = 0.754. Serotonin, motilin, somatostatin, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10: no significant between-group differences (IL-4 adjusted for a higher baseline in the PA53 group). Pediococcus was enriched in the PA53 group at weeks 4 and 8; within that group ACE and Chao1 richness fell from baseline to week 8 (FDR-adjusted P = 0.006); between-group diversity differences were not significant. Results are reported for the 81 who finished; the paper does not describe an intention-to-treat analysis. The trial was sized on stool score: 15 a group would detect a 0.74-point difference (taken from an earlier probiotic trial), and it aimed for 40 a group to allow for dropouts and the secondary measures. Product and placebo were supplied by Wecare Probiotics Co. Ltd.; the authors report no funding and no conflicts of interest. Data available from the authors on request.
- The Bristol Stool Form Scale came out of a 1997 study by Lewis and Heaton, who found that stool shape tracked how long food took to pass through the gut. That is why doctors take the chart seriously.
- The trial was sized to detect a gap of about 0.74 points on the stool chart, the difference an earlier probiotic trial had found. The gap it found, 0.73 points at week eight, was almost exactly that.
- In this trial, the placebo was not quite nothing: dextrin is a soluble fibre, and the authors warn it may have eased constipation a little in the comparison group.
- Thirty billion bacteria sounds like a lot, but it is in the usual range for probiotic products. Dose is one reason results from one product can't be carried over to another.
- Pediococcus acidilactici makes pediocin, a natural antibacterial protein. Pediocins have been studied as food preservatives, separately from any probiotic use.
- Within the probiotic group, a common gut bacterium, Faecalibacterium, was more abundant at the start of the trial than at the end. The paper does not discuss what that means.
- Pediococcus acidilactici PA53 supplementation improves stool form and modulates gut microbiota and inflammatory responses in adults with functional constipation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialFood Science & Nutrition, 1 October 2026 · The study. Open access, read in full
- Full text on PubMed Central (PMC13628159)US National Library of Medicine · Version read for this item, including Tables 1 to 3
- Trial registration NCT06761443ClinicalTrials.gov · Registry record for the trial
- Global prevalence of functional constipation according to the Rome criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysisLancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2021 · Cited in the trial for how common constipation is; we did not read it
- Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit timeScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1997 · Lewis and Heaton, the origin of the Bristol scale; we did not read it
- Hotel Room Toilet Paper Roll FoldedWikimedia Commons · Image, CC BY 2.0, Tony Webster
General information, not medical advice. This trial tested one probiotic strain at one dose; other products may behave differently. See a doctor if constipation is new, persistent or getting worse, or if it comes with blood in the stool, unexplained weight loss, severe pain or vomiting. Ask a pharmacist or doctor before starting a supplement if you are pregnant, have a weakened immune system or take regular medicines.
Analysis by NutroPractic from the sources listed. Written for general readers; it does not replace advice from your own doctor.
From our articles
Read, then eat a little better
Plain-language guides on nutrition and wellness, backed by research.

Global data
Diabetes, obesity, child malnutrition and hunger, 1980 to 2050: what the numbers show
How diabetes, obesity, child malnutrition and hunger have changed since 1980, with sourced figures and a basic projection to 2050. Click a condition to explore the chart and its facts.
5 Oct 2026

Indian kitchen
Rice, roti and blood sugar: building a balanced Indian plate with the ICMR-NIN 2024 guidelines
About one in nine Indian adults has diabetes and many more have prediabetes. You don't have to give up rice or roti. How the ICMR-NIN Dietary Guidelines for Indians (2024) suggest building a plate, plus simple habits that help keep blood sugar steady.
3 Oct 2026

Micronutrients
Vitamin D and B12: two common gaps, from northern winters to vegetarian kitchens
Vitamin D runs low in Canadian and European winters, and surprisingly often in sunny India too. Vitamin B12 is a risk for vegetarians, people over 50 and people on certain medicines. Who is at risk, what the official advice is in North America, Europe and India, and where to get both.
3 Oct 2026
Newsfeed for your website
Want this feed on your website?
Add it to any site with one copy-and-paste snippet. No sign-up, and it updates itself every hour.
Start with a virtual consultation
Tell Dr. Triveni what you want to change. You will leave with a clear next step, whether you are in Toronto, London, New York or Chennai.